The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DTII · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SCHL | EPC | DTII | TTI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 45 | 38 | 70 (highest) | 60 |
| Pricing power | 90 (highest) | 73 | 17 | 5 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 53 | — | 56 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 28 | 55 | 84 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 41 | 40 | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| No price data | 13% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 289% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $1.3B | $512218 | $1.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |