The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SEG · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
UNIT · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RDCT · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SEG | UNIT | RDCT | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 | 38 (highest) | 37 | 37 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 85 (highest) | 70 | 10 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 0 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 42 (highest) | — | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 0 | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | 144% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 756% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $333M | $2.5B | Not reported | $25.3B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2025 |