The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FLO · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SENEA | TOFB | BGS | FLO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 22 (highest) | 22 (highest) | 22 (highest) | 21 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 34 | 15 | 19 | 50 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 0 | 38 (highest) | 27 | — |
| Returns on capital | 10 | 11 | 0 | 17 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 19 | 28 | 40 (highest) | 1 |
| Capital allocation | 45 (highest) | 20 | 24 | 17 |
| 114% above value if growth stopped today | 111% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 29% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $1.2B | $3.3M | $281M | $1.6B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |