The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SES · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

KOAN · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

DOCN · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

STI · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSESKOANDOCNSTI
Moat Score (0–100)50 (highest)50 (highest)50 (highest)50 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend705080 (highest)50
Pricing power887096 (highest)70
Returns on capital06 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)2328
Capital allocation35244451 (highest)
No price dataNo price data5167% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$184M$55201$11.4B$49.3M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2024FY2025FY2025