The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SF · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

TW · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CNS · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BLK · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSFTWCNSBLK
Moat Score (0–100)6669 (highest)6866
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend31100 (highest)3376
Pricing power————
Returns on capital8823100 (highest)60
Balance-sheet safety7873100 (highest)76
Capital allocation6981 (highest)3953
No price data313% above value if growth stopped today104% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)148% above value if growth stopped today
Market capNot reported$24.4B$3.6B$163.7B
Moat tierNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025