The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TXRH · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SFM | TXRH | CPRT | ULTA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 92 | 96 (highest) | 92 | 92 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 99 | 95 | 100 (highest) | 97 |
| Pricing power | 60 | — | 100 (highest) | 61 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 97 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 100 (highest) | 93 | 60 | 100 (highest) |
| 142% above value if growth stopped today | 266% above value if growth stopped today | 97% above value if growth stopped today | 57% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $7.2B | $12.7B | $27.0B | $21.0B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |