The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SGC · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CRL · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | SGC | CRL | BODI | III |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 38 | 46 (highest) | 20 | 29 |
| Pricing power | 60 | 100 (highest) | 91 | 68 |
| Returns on capital | — | 18 (highest) | 10 | 11 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 19 | 0 | 55 (highest) | 42 |
| Capital discipline | 23 | 12 | 0 | 24 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | Around the high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 135% above high estimate | No price data | 68% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $194M | $11.2B | $76M | $184M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |