The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SMC · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PEG · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

NFG · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

AVA · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSMCPEGNFGAVA
Moat Score (0–100)5354 (highest)5352
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend50637183 (highest)
Pricing power100 (highest)100 (highest)96
Returns on capital334 (highest)2
Balance-sheet safety0303392 (highest)
Capital allocation6072 (highest)3231
1502% above value if growth stopped today136% above value if growth stopped today42% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)62% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$415M$36.7B$7.5B$3.1B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025