The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SMC · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PEG · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

NFG · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

AVA · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSMCPEGNFGAVA
Moat Score (0–100)5354 (highest)5352
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend50637183 (highest)
Pricing power100 (highest)100 (highest)96
Returns on capital334 (highest)2
Balance-sheet safety0303392 (highest)
Capital discipline6072 (highest)3231
Price vs. high estimate1329% above high estimate89% above high estimate41% above high estimate12% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate)
Market cap$370M$39.7B$7.5B$3.5B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025