The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SNFI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CRWS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

GRNQ · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

JOBY · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSNFICRWSGRNQJOBY
Moat Score (0–100)30 (highest)30 (highest)30 (highest)30 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend50 (highest)221340
Pricing power04484 (highest)
Returns on capital037 (highest)00
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)402855 (highest)
Capital allocation44 (highest)62424
No price data56% below value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market capNot reported$27.1M$86.1M$5.6B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2025