The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OABIW · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PTLO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SNTL | OABIW | PTLO | VEEE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 28 | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 28 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 72 | 15 | 76 (highest) | 27 |
| Pricing power | 19 (highest) | — | — | 10 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 14 (highest) | 6 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 0 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $36.3M | $12.8M | Not reported | $29M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |