The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SON · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

PARR · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AMR · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

HNOI · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSONPARRAMRHNOI
Moat Score (0–100)48 (highest)48 (highest)48 (highest)48 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend75 (highest)75 (highest)1750
Pricing power34 (highest)34 (highest)
Returns on capital243677 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety265355 (highest)55 (highest)
Capital allocation81 (highest)294452
11% above value if growth stopped today8% below value if growth stopped today48% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$5.7B$3.8B$1.8B$9.8M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025