The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SSP · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SALM · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
NUVR · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SSP | SALM | NUVR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 10 | 15 (highest) | 14 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 27 | 31 | 35 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 3 | 4 (highest) | 2 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 10 | 26 (highest) | 17 |
| 89% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 2407% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $263M | $26.1M | $91.3M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2022 | FY2025 |