The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CHSCP · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ST | ZSTK | WHR | CHSCP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 23 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 28 | 34 (highest) | 15 | — |
| Pricing power | 53 (highest) | 13 | 26 | 7 |
| Returns on capital | 17 | 0 | 37 (highest) | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 (highest) | 1 | 27 |
| Capital allocation | 19 | 44 | 40 | 56 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 41% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $1.5M | $2.1B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |