The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LUV · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SWBI | SNX | SXI | LUV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) | 48 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 95 (highest) | 80 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 38 | 11 | 61 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 41 | 10 | 31 | 45 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 43 | 12 | 45 |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 80 (highest) | 56 | 40 |
| 59% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 92% above value if growth stopped today | 388% above value if growth stopped today | 329% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $653M | $19.6B | $3.6B | $22.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |