The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
T · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CABO · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | T | LUMN | CABO | TSQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 26 (highest) | 26 (highest) | 26 (highest) | 26 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 47 (highest) | 5 | 27 | 36 |
| Pricing power | — | 82 (highest) | — | 48 |
| Returns on capital | 6 | 0 | 31 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 23 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 27 | 44 | 47 (highest) | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | Around the high estimate | No price data | 91% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $168.9B | $6.5B | $212M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |