The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TKO · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CHDN · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FUN · Communications · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
NXST · Communications · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TKO | CHDN | FUN | NXST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 43 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 | 95 (highest) | 50 | 33 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 100 | — |
| Returns on capital | 40 (highest) | 14 | 0 | 16 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 30 | 1 | 28 | 40 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 20 | 67 | 41 | 81 (highest) |
| 1468% above value if growth stopped today | 23% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 58% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $34.0B | $5.7B | $825M | $5.0B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |