The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

TSSI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

WAB · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RUSHA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

THRM · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureTSSIWABRUSHATHRM
Moat Score (0–100)55 (highest)55 (highest)55 (highest)55 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend8599 (highest)6859
Pricing power1049 (highest)3141
Returns on capital—647 (highest)37
Balance-sheet safety100 (highest)416997
Capital allocation2480 (highest)6040
12716% above value if growth stopped today280% above value if growth stopped today8% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)49% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$195M$48.9B$3.7B$886M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025