The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TSSI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WAB · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
RUSHA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | TSSI | WAB | RUSHA | THRM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 | 99 (highest) | 68 | 59 |
| Pricing power | 10 | 49 (highest) | 31 | 41 |
| Returns on capital | — | 6 | 47 (highest) | 37 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 41 | 69 | 97 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 80 (highest) | 60 | 40 |
| 17483% above value if growth stopped today | 300% above value if growth stopped today | 83% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 118% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $268M | $51.6B | $6.2B | $1.3B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |