The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TTEC · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
XLAB · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TTEC | SHLS | QXL | XLAB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 27 | 70 (highest) | 50 | 50 |
| Pricing power | — | 55 | 70 (highest) | 32 |
| Returns on capital | 93 (highest) | 45 | 7 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 37 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 33 | 19 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| 84% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 224% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $73.3M | $1.2B | $47.1M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |