The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DTII · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AR · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TTI | DTII | SCHL | AR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 45 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 70 (highest) | 45 | 40 |
| Pricing power | 5 | 17 | 90 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 56 (highest) | — | 0 | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 84 | 55 | 55 | 90 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 | 41 | 48 (highest) |
| 289% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 229% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $1.1B | $512218 | Not reported | $10.9B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |