The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WH · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | UAA | DXLG | CVU | WH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 13 | 18 | 15 | 55 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 77 (highest) | 68 | 0 | — |
| Returns on capital | 8 | 12 | 83 (highest) | 47 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 2 |
| Capital allocation | 50 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 37 |
| 1656% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 29% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $3.0B | Not reported | $62M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |