The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ULH · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ALK · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ULH | GFF | ALK | WKC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 27 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 24 | 40 | 60 (highest) | 33 |
| Pricing power | — | 34 (highest) | — | 7 |
| Returns on capital | 27 (highest) | 8 | 18 | 5 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 59 | 56 | 33 | 64 (highest) |
| 63% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 387% above value if growth stopped today | 104% above value if growth stopped today | 76% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $415M | $4.2B | $5.3B | $2.1B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |