The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
VSBC · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
LOVE · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
GPI · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | UNF | VSBC | LOVE | GPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 61 | 62 (highest) | 61 | 61 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 (highest) | — | 48 | 56 |
| Pricing power | 62 | 47 | 90 (highest) | 26 |
| Returns on capital | 14 | 100 (highest) | 25 | 51 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 55 | 100 (highest) | 73 |
| Capital allocation | 60 | 44 | 44 | 100 (highest) |
| 202% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 20% below value if growth stopped today | 53% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $4.9B | $6.6M | $212M | $2.9B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 |