The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

UROY · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

VCTR · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AAMI · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

Wonderful & reasonably priced

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

OPY · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

Wonderful & reasonably priced

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureUROYVCTRAAMIOPY
Moat Score (0–100)6365 (highest)6463
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend80 (highest)743959
Pricing power
Returns on capital1256100 (highest)28
Balance-sheet safety100 (highest)4936100 (highest)
Capital allocation6180 (highest)80 (highest)64
328% above value if growth stopped today109% above value if growth stopped today64% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)46% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$652M$7.3B$3.3B$1.2B
Moat tierNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025