The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
V · Technology · Not rated
Not enough comparable filing data to score at least four of the five filters, so no composite is published. No composite: 2 components abstained (businessTrend: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend.; pricingPower: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power.).
MA · Technology · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | V | MA |
|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | — | 89 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | — | 80 |
| Pricing power | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 96 (highest) | 94 |
| Capital allocation | 80 (highest) | 80 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Not rated | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 |