The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

WELPP · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

WEC · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

WTRG · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CWT · Utilities · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureWELPPWECWTRGCWT
Moat Score (0–100)42 (highest)42 (highest)42 (highest)41
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend6684 (highest)62
Pricing power99 (highest)96
Returns on capital163432 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety161229 (highest)
Capital allocation354377 (highest)43
No price data141% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data169% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$2.2B$37.7BNot reported$3.0B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025