The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GPC · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | WEYS | GPC | SXI | HLF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 | 61 (highest) | 61 (highest) | 60 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 53 | 53 | 80 (highest) | 23 |
| Pricing power | 66 | 56 | 61 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 38 | 100 (highest) | 31 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 (highest) | — | 46 | 18 |
| Capital allocation | 72 | 35 | 86 (highest) | 59 |
| 51% above value if growth stopped today | 77% above value if growth stopped today | 267% above value if growth stopped today | 51% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $500M | $18.1B | $3.3B | $1.5B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |