The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PAG · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | WLDN | ALV | PAG | TTEK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 | 65 (highest) | 64 | 64 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 | 94 (highest) | 59 | 79 |
| Pricing power | 52 (highest) | 29 | 28 | 20 |
| Returns on capital | 24 | 70 | 56 | 73 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 62 | 80 | 57 |
| Capital allocation | 60 | 68 | 99 (highest) | 91 |
| 454% above value if growth stopped today | 62% above value if growth stopped today | 16% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 159% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.1B | $8.8B | $14.3B | $8.3B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |