The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CNTM · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | WLFC | HELE | EAF | CNTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 15 | 15 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 48 | 71 (highest) | 23 | 36 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 32 | 80 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 77 (highest) | 64 | 64 | 44 |
| No price data | 60% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $657M | $192M | $903M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |