The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FLY · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AKA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | WYGC | FLY | AKA | FLWS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) | 41 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 56 | 60 (highest) | 38 | 10 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 7 | 92 (highest) | 69 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | — | 5 | 45 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 | 43 | 54 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 143% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $13.2M | $3.1B | $118M | $244M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |