The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
WYNN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
JCTC · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | WYNN | JCTC | NORD | GO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 34 | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 34 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 75 (highest) | 10 | 50 | 60 |
| Pricing power | — | 27 | 71 (highest) | 54 |
| Returns on capital | 17 | 37 (highest) | 0 | 6 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 45 (highest) | 44 | 24 | 24 |
| 177% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | 28% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $10.1B | Not reported | $43M | $884M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |