The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

XEL · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

KNTK · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

AES · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

HTO · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureXELKNTKAESHTO
Moat Score (0–100)3637 (highest)37 (highest)36
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend—806098 (highest)
Pricing power100 (highest)2331—
Returns on capital3 (highest)0—0
Balance-sheet safety0028 (highest)1
Capital allocation4180 (highest)2845
142% above value if growth stopped today75% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)285% above value if growth stopped today121% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$47.6B$3.5B$10.6B$2.1B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025