The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
XLAB · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
TTEC · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | XLAB | QXL | TTEC | MAX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) | 45 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 50 | 27 | 70 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 32 | 70 (highest) | — | 28 |
| Returns on capital | — | 7 | 93 (highest) | 66 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 28 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 44 | 33 | 61 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 87% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $48.1M | $60M | $628M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |