The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SBH · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
| Measure | YUM | TTEK | SBH | TILE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 63 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 | 79 | 43 | 82 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 90 (highest) | 20 | 85 | 62 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 73 | 100 (highest) | 39 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 7 | 57 | 40 | 64 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 56 | 91 (highest) | 53 | 69 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 47% above high estimate | 60% above high estimate | 42% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 134% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $41.2B | $8.3B | $1.4B | $1.9B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |