AUTOZONE INC

AZO · Consumer Discretionary · FY2025 filings · · not refreshed in 36 days · Wide moat ·

On the watchlist

Wide moat
Share / Embed this score
Embed this score

The five investor questions

93

2021–2025 (latest 5 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $14.6B to $18.9B, increasing; diluted EPS 95.19 to 144.87, increasing.

89

Median gross margin 52.7% over 10y, very stable.

100

Median ROIC 60.2%, above the 12% hurdle in 100% of years.

40

Net debt/EBITDA 2.0x, interest coverage 7x.

86

Owner earnings changed +8.1%/yr over up to the ten most recent annual observations.

Price vs. value if growth stopped today

A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.

Above value if growth stopped todayBelow value if growth stopped today
No price data
$2.5B
Unavailable — insufficient owner-earnings data
Unavailable — insufficient growth-model data
$2957.41
No price data

This zero-growth estimate assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. The recent FY revenue series does not trigger the three-consecutive-declines flag.

Among the current top-score group, the median current price is 239% above the zero-growth estimate across 48 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.

Score records captured Jul 26, 2026.

Exactly which 50 companies?

FTNT, META, MEDP, IBEX, MSFT, GOOGL, LULU, ANF, IDXX, TXRH, FHI, QLYS, FFIV, ADBE, LLY, MANH, VEEV, GRMN, SSD, MNST, DOCS, MCO, CPRT, NTAP, LRCX, NVDA, CORT, SFM, MPTI, ULTA, SN, RMD, ROL, PAYC, IRMD, INTU, DECK, MORN, LGCY, DAL, GWW, ISRG, MPWR, CTAS, LOPE, MRK, CMG, FAST, BKNG, ORLY

Missing a usable price or zero-growth estimate: ANF, BKNG.

Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth multiple 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 4% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.

19 years of fundamentals

The business, in plain English

AUTOZONE INC booked $18.9B of revenue in FY2025 in the Consumer Discretionary sector and kept 52.6% of it as gross profit — a solid-margin business by that measure. After every other cost, 13.2% of each revenue dollar reached the bottom line.

Across the filed record, revenue grew from $6.5B (FY2008) to $18.9B (FY2025) — about 6.5% a year compounded over 17 years.

It earned 55.7% on invested capital in the latest filed year, FY2025. Across the full 14-year measurable filed record, median ROIC was 51.4%. Over the v3 recent window (10 measurable filed years), median ROIC was 60.2%. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 100/100.

The balance sheet carried $8.8B of total debt in FY2025 against $2.5B of owner earnings — roughly 3.5 years of owner earnings to retire it all. Balance-Sheet Safety scores it 40/100.

Put together: Returns on Capital is the strongest of the five filters (100/100) and Balance-Sheet Safety the weakest (40/100), which is how AZO lands at 82/100 — a Wide moat.

This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.

FY2007–FY2025 · 19 fiscal years, normalized from AZO’s SEC filings

Sales, as filed$18.9B FY2025
$0$10B$20B2007201320192025
Revenue kept after cost of goods52.6% FY2025
0%20%40%2007201320192025
Standard ROIC or separately labeled Operating ROICROIC 55.7% FY2025
0%50%100%2007201320192025
Cash an owner could take out$2.5B FY2025
$0$1B$2B2007201320192025

Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in AZO’s filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.

Negative book equity, scored wide

An editorial reading of AUTOZONE INC’s filed financial history. Scores, sub-scores, rank and valuation figures are read from this page’s own score card as you loaded it rather than written into the text, so they move when the filings do. Figures quoted from company releases and filings carry the document and its date in the sentence that uses them.

AutoZone's fiscal 2025 balance sheet, as filed with the SEC and read on August 15, 2026, shows stockholders' equity of negative $3.4 billion — total debt of $8.8 billion against $272 million of cash, inside $19.4 billion of total assets; the normalized series on this page carries $8.8B of total debt. Negative book equity records an accumulated accounting deficit; by itself, it does not establish insolvency or liquidation value. The same page scores AutoZone 81.7 out of 100 — a wide moat, ranked #36 of 487 scored Consumer Discretionary companies. The narrower paradox is useful: a negative owners' equity account beside a wide-moat score, both drawn from the filed financial history.

The accounting line is incomplete as a picture of the operating business. What it cannot show is what the capital still inside the business earns. The returns-on-capital filter gives AutoZone 100 out of 100 — the strongest sub-score on the card — and the registry's own reading is: Median ROIC 60.2%, above the 12% hurdle in 100% of years. A business earning a median 51 cents per invested dollar across 14 filed years doesn't need much book equity. It manufactures the cash equity would otherwise have to supply.

The operating record behind that number is on the same page. Revenue and EPS trend scores 93 (2021–2025 (latest 5 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue 14629585000.00 to 18938717000.00, increasing; diluted EPS 95.19 to 144.87, increasing.), and pricing power scores 89 on Median gross margin 52.7% over 10y, very stable. EPS growing faster than revenue over the same window is per-share arithmetic, not a separate claim: fewer shares, same profit pool.

Fewer shares is the deliberate part. AutoZone's board has authorized $42.2 billion of share repurchases since the program began in 1998, per the company's own June 16, 2026 press release announcing its latest $1.5 billion addition. Those buybacks are what drove book equity below zero — retiring stock at market prices far above its carrying value drains the equity account even as the business grows. The capital-allocation filter scores the result 86 (Owner earnings +8.1%/yr, share count shrinking (buybacks).).

So how does the balance-sheet filter handle a company with negative book value? It doesn't fail it, and it doesn't ignore the debt either. Balance-sheet safety scores 40 out of 100 — the weakest of the five filters — on Net debt/EBITDA 2.0x, interest coverage 7x. The filter measures whether cash flow services the debt, not whether book equity is positive. The negative equity does surface elsewhere on the page as pure arithmetic noise: return on equity and the equity multiplier both flip sign on a negative denominator rather than on losses. The registry reports it without dressing it up.

The current fiscal year says the machine still runs. In its third-quarter fiscal 2026 release dated May 26, 2026, AutoZone reported net sales of $4.8 billion, up 8.4%, with domestic same-store sales up 4.1% and EPS of $38.07; the company opened 82 stores in the quarter to reach 7,856 worldwide. The commercial side — parts sold to repair shops rather than to weekend mechanics — represented 31.7% of domestic auto-parts sales in fiscal 2025, per the company's Form 10-K for the year ended August 30, 2025.

One thing the registry won't do is price it. The valuation module abstains: the value-if-growth-stopped estimate on this page reads as unavailable for want of owner-earnings data, and against a recent price of $2957.41 the page renders no price-versus-value verdict at all. The registry doesn't guess. An abstention is not an endorsement of the price, and a reader should treat that price as unanchored by any baseline on this page.

That leaves the remainder of the paradox — the part the filed financial history resolves in AutoZone's favor only for as long as two conditions hold. First, the debt structure works because coverage holds; the same obligation sits on a business with no book-equity cushion, so a durable drop in earnings would expose that thin accounting cushion. The 40 is the registry pricing exactly that asymmetry. Second, the demand base: the parts that fill those 7,856 stores serve combustion-engine vehicles, and what an increasingly electric fleet does to per-vehicle parts demand is a question no AutoZone filing on this page answers. Neither risk is hypothetical. Neither is scored away. They're simply outweighed, on the current filed financial history, by returns on capital that a balance-sheet convention was never built to describe.

A company can report negative book equity and still generate strong operating returns. That's the claim this score makes. The filings will keep grading it.

Where each figure lives: this registry page for AZO, read as you loaded it (all scores, sub-scores, ROIC, owner earnings, balance-sheet lines and the valuation abstention) · AutoZone's Q3 fiscal 2026 earnings release (May 26, 2026) for quarterly sales, comps, EPS and store count · AutoZone's June 16, 2026 press release "AutoZone Authorizes Additional Stock Repurchase" for the $1.5 billion tranche and the $42.2 billion cumulative authorization since 1998 · AutoZone's Form 10-K for fiscal 2025 (year ended August 30, 2025) for the 31.7% domestic commercial mix.

Registry figures as of Jul 26, 2026, from filings through FY2025 under moat-index@3.0.0. Educational only — not a recommendation to buy or sell AZO. See the disclaimer.

Flagship explainer

How AUTOZONE INC makes its money

Start with a dollar of revenue and follow what the filing says remains.

revenueBranching filed flows with values and percentages directly labeled. Missing filing concepts are omitted rather than estimated.Revenue$18.9B · 100%Cost of revenue$9.0B · 47%Gross profit$10.0B · 53%Operating income$3.6B · 19%Income before tax$3.1B · 17%Income tax$636M · 3%Net income$2.5B · 13%As of 2025-08-30 · 1 SEC filing sourceBuy Like Buffett · buylikebuffett.com

Honest partial: the filing did not provide a normalized tag for Research and development, Selling, general and administrative; those components are omitted, not plugged.

Table alternative
Filed lineValue% of revenueSource
$18.9B100%
Cost of revenue$9.0B47%
$10.0B53%
$3.6B19%
Income before tax$3.1B17%
Income tax$636M3%
$2.5B13%
Source: · event Aug 30, 2025 · retrieved Jul 26, 2026 · annual-row source set
Embed this chart

Flagship explainer

What AUTOZONE INC owns — and owes

AUTOZONE INC's filing tags don't support a full breakdown — here's what is filed:

Table alternative
Filed lineValue% of assetsSource
Total assets$19.4B100%
Cash and equivalents$272M1%
$8.8B46%
Stockholders’ equity−$3.4B−18%
Source: · event Aug 30, 2025 · retrieved Jul 26, 2026 · annual-row source set

Flagship explainer

What drives AUTOZONE INC’s return on equity?

ROE is five filed business factors multiplied together.

DuPont return on equity factor treeReturn on equity branches into tax burden, interest burden, operating margin, asset turnover, and the equity multiplier.Return on equity−61%Tax burden80%net income ÷ pretax incomeInterest burden87%pretax ÷ operating incomeOperating margin19%operating income ÷ revenueAsset turnover1.04×revenue ÷ average assetsEquity multiplier-4.47×average assets ÷ average equityAs of 2025-08-30 · 1 SEC filing sourceBuy Like Buffett · buylikebuffett.com
DuPont source inputs
InputValueFiscal yearSource
$2.5BFY2025
Income before tax$3.1BFY2025
Operating income$3.6BFY2025
$18.9BFY2025
Ending assets$19.4BFY2025
Beginning assets$17.2BFY2024
−$3.4BFY2025
−$4.7BFY2024
Source: · event Aug 30, 2025 · retrieved Jul 26, 2026 · annual-row source set
Embed this chart

Flagship explainer

Where AUTOZONE INC's cash went

AUTOZONE INC’s filing does not supply enough provenance-matched cash-flow lines for a truthful flow chart — here’s what is filed:

Table alternative
Filed lineValue% of cash from operationsSource
Cash from operations$3.1B100%
Depreciation and amortization$613M20%
Source: · event Aug 30, 2025 · retrieved Jul 26, 2026 · annual-row source set

Curated 19-manager tier

Who reported holding AUTOZONE INC

Delayed public 13F reports for 2026-Q2—not live positions, trades, or recommendations.

0 holding0 exited1 not holding1/19 resolved18 not retrieved

Named manager positions and quarter-over-quarter changes
ManagerReported positionQuarter-over-quarterFiling accession
Markel / Markel-GaynerNo position reportedNo position reported
Abrams CapitalNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Akre CapitalNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Baupost GroupNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Berkshire HathawayNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Brave Warrior AdvisorsNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Dodge & CoxNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
First EagleNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
FundsmithNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Gardner Russo & QuinnNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Gates Foundation TrustNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Mairs & PowerNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Oakmark / Harris AssociatesNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Pershing SquareNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Polen CapitalNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Sequoia / Ruane CunniffNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Southeastern Asset ManagementNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Tweedy, BrowneNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved
Yacktman Asset ManagementNot retrievedComparison not retrievedFiling not retrieved

Position size uses shares and filed value from each manager’s 13F. Portfolio weight uses the eligible long-share filing denominator. Changes compare only with the immediately preceding calendar quarter.

Source: · event Jun 30, 2026 · retrieved Jul 26, 2026

Flagship explainer

What AUTOZONE INC insiders reported

We could not retrieve insider activity for this rendering; no zero-activity claim is shown.

Unavailable: Form 4 activity could not be retrieved for this rendering.

Moat Score history

16 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale81.7 / 100
0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatJul 17, 2026Jul 26, 2026

Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.

Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

  1. Normalizer upgraded unstamped (version unknown)tomoat-xbrl-normalizer@1.1.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 26, 2026
  2. Methodology upgraded moat-index@2.0.0tomoat-index@3.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 23, 2026
  3. Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Insider activity

Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”

These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.

The insider-filing service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed answer is shown for AZO.

Track record

How AUTOZONE INC’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.

Point-in-time scores 20112025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight

Point-in-time Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year

How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored AZO on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.

0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatPoint-in-time Moat Score1002005001,000Indexed price · log scale (2012 = 100)201120142017202020232026

Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.

What followed, in the years it rated Wide

In the 15 years AZO rated Wide-moat (2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025), the median forward total return that followed — measured only after each year’s filings were public — was:

  • 1 year 16% vs the S&P 500’s 16% (price basis) · median over 14 years
  • 3 years 64% vs the S&P 500’s 34% (price basis) · median over 12 years
  • 5 years 153% vs the S&P 500’s 82% (price basis) · median over 10 years

These are medians computed from the data, not a claim about any one year. The company figures are total returns (dividends reinvested); the S&P 500 is the price-only ^GSPC index, which excludes dividends and so understates the index — the gap flatters the company. A quality rating is not a return forecast, and past returns don’t predict future ones. Educational only, not investment advice.

Consumer Discretionary context

#36 of 487 scored Consumer Discretionary companies, ranked by Moat Score.

Nearest peers by Moat Score

  1. #34WINA WINMARK CORPORATION81.9 out of 100, Wide moatWide moat
  2. #35ROST Ross Stores, Inc.81.7 out of 100, Wide moatWide moat
  3. #37AMZN AMAZON COM INC81.4 out of 100, Wide moatWide moat
  4. #38BURL BURLINGTON STORES, INC.81.0 out of 100, Wide moatWide moat

Compare AZO with its nearest peersAll Consumer Discretionary companies on the Index →

Common questions about AZO

Does AUTOZONE INC have an economic moat?
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores AUTOZONE INC (AZO) 81.7 out of 100 — a Wide moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 93, pricing power 89, returns on capital 100, balance-sheet safety 40, capital allocation 86.
How has AZO's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 16 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 81.7 out of 100 (wide moat). No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.