RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.

RRGB · Consumer Discretionary · $130M mkt cap · FY2025 filings · No moat ·

Doesn't clear the bar

No moat
Share / Embed this score
Embed this score

The five investor questions

42

2021–2025 (latest 5 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $1.2B to $1.2B, increasing; diluted EPS -3.22 to -1.31, increasing.

100

Median gross margin 76.9% over 3y, very stable.

0

Median ROIC -2.1%, above the 12% hurdle in 0% of years.

17

Net debt/EBITDA 2.8x, interest coverage 0x.

24

Owner earnings changed trend unclear over up to the ten most recent annual observations.

Price vs. value if growth stopped today

A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.

Above value if growth stopped todayBelow value if growth stopped today
No price data
Not reported
Unavailable — insufficient owner-earnings data
Unavailable — insufficient growth-model data
$7.22
No price data

This zero-growth estimate assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. The recent FY revenue series does not trigger the three-consecutive-declines flag.

Among the current top-score group, the median current price is 239% above the zero-growth estimate across 48 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.

Score records captured Jul 26, 2026.

Exactly which 50 companies?

FTNT, META, MEDP, IBEX, MSFT, GOOGL, LULU, ANF, IDXX, TXRH, FHI, QLYS, FFIV, ADBE, LLY, MANH, VEEV, GRMN, SSD, MNST, DOCS, MCO, CPRT, NTAP, LRCX, NVDA, CORT, SFM, MPTI, ULTA, SN, RMD, ROL, PAYC, IRMD, INTU, DECK, MORN, LGCY, DAL, GWW, ISRG, MPWR, CTAS, LOPE, MRK, CMG, FAST, BKNG, ORLY

Missing a usable price or zero-growth estimate: ANF, BKNG.

Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth multiple 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 0% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.

18 years of fundamentals

The business, in plain English

Across the filed record, revenue grew from $841M (FY2009) to $1.2B (FY2025) — about 2.3% a year compounded over 16 years.

It earned 5.0% on invested capital in the latest filed year, FY2025. Across the full 17-year measurable filed record, median ROIC was 3.4%. Over the v3 recent window (10 measurable filed years), median ROIC was −2.1%. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 0/100.

The balance sheet carried $170M of total debt in FY2025. Balance-Sheet Safety scores it 17/100.

Put together: Pricing Power is the strongest of the five filters (100/100) and Returns on Capital the weakest (0/100), which is how RRGB lands at 37/100 — a None moat.

This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.

FY2008–FY2025 · 18 fiscal years, normalized from RRGB’s SEC filings

Sales, as filed$1.2B FY2025
$0$500M$1B2008201420202025
Revenue kept after cost of goods76.6% FY2018
0%50%2008201420202025
Standard ROIC or separately labeled Operating ROICROIC 5.0% FY2025
−50%0%2008201420202025
Cash an owner could take out−$2.9M FY2025
−$200M−$100M$02008201420202025

Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in RRGB’s filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.

Visual explainers

The filing-backed explainer service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed chart is shown.

Moat Score history

15 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale36.5 / 100
0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatJul 17, 2026Jul 26, 2026

Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.

Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

  1. Normalizer upgraded unstamped (version unknown)tomoat-xbrl-normalizer@1.1.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 26, 2026
  2. Methodology upgraded moat-index@2.0.0tomoat-index@3.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 23, 2026
  3. Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Insider activity

Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”

These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.

The insider-filing service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed answer is shown for RRGB.

Track record

How RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.’s moat rated in each of the years we can reconstruct from its filings — scored only on what was knowable at the time — and what its price and returns did afterward. The score never saw a price; the two are joined only in hindsight, for education, not as a signal.

Point-in-time scores 20112025, one methodology version · reconstructed from filings on file each Dec 31 — never with hindsight

Point-in-time Moat Score (dot colored by tier)Indexed price (total-return (dividends reinvested))Rated Wide-moat that year

How to read this: each dot is what the engine would have scored RRGB on that December 31; the line below is its total-return price path (dividends reinvested) in the years since.

0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatPoint-in-time Moat Score2050100200Indexed price · log scale (2012 = 100)201120142017202020232026

Two tracks, one timeline: the score has its own 0–100 scale (top), the price its own 100-based scale (bottom) — never a shared axis. The price path is a total-return (dividends reinvested) index built from the same data the forward returns use; gaps in the score line are years with no reconstructed rating (see the table for why). The Table view carries every value.

What followed, in the years it rated Wide

In the reconstructed history shown, RRGB did not rate Wide-moat in any year, so there is no wide-moat track record to report. That absence is itself the honest answer — we don’t manufacture a comparison where the rating never earned one.

Consumer Discretionary context

#330 of 487 scored Consumer Discretionary companies, ranked by Moat Score.

Nearest peers by Moat Score

  1. #328VOYG Voyager Technologies, Inc./DE36.6 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  2. #329HOG Harley-Davidson, Inc.36.5 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  3. #331AUC ATIF HOLDINGS LIMITED36.5 out of 100, No moatNo moat
  4. #332CTRN CITI TRENDS, INC.36.4 out of 100, No moatNo moat

Compare RRGB with its nearest peersAll Consumer Discretionary companies on the Index →

Common questions about RRGB

Does RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC. have an economic moat?
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC. (RRGB) 36.5 out of 100 — below the Shallow-moat bar, so no moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 42, pricing power 100, returns on capital 0, balance-sheet safety 17, capital allocation 24.
How has RRGB's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 15 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 36.5 out of 100 (no moat). No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.