The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

AAMI · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

Wonderful & reasonably priced

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BLK · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

VCTR · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

OPY · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

Wonderful & reasonably priced

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureAAMIBLKVCTROPY
Moat Score (0–100)6466 (highest)6563
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend3976 (highest)7459
Pricing power
Returns on capital100 (highest)605628
Balance-sheet safety367649100 (highest)
Capital allocation80 (highest)5380 (highest)64
69% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)148% above value if growth stopped today79% above value if growth stopped today46% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$2.9B$163.7B$6.2B$1.2B
Moat tierNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025