The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

AAMI · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

Wonderful & reasonably priced

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BLK · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

VCTR · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

UROY · Other · Narrow moat

Narrow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureAAMIBLKVCTRUROY
Moat Score (0–100)6466 (highest)6563
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend39767480 (highest)
Pricing power
Returns on capital100 (highest)605612
Balance-sheet safety367649100 (highest)
Capital allocation80 (highest)5380 (highest)61
65% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)148% above value if growth stopped today96% above value if growth stopped today339% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$3.2B$163.7B$6.8B$668M
Moat tierNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moatNarrow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026