The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AR · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FSI · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | AR | SCHL | TTI | FSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 45 | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 45 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 40 | 45 | 60 (highest) | 41 |
| Pricing power | — | 90 (highest) | 5 | 45 |
| Returns on capital | 4 | 0 | 56 (highest) | 50 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 90 | 55 | 84 | 91 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 48 (highest) | 41 | 24 | 0 |
| 229% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 289% above value if growth stopped today | 89% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $10.9B | Not reported | $1.1B | $63.7M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |