The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CHSCL · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | AVT | WHR | ST | CHSCL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 23 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 37 (highest) | 15 | 28 | — |
| Pricing power | 24 | 26 | 53 (highest) | 7 |
| Returns on capital | 13 | 37 (highest) | 17 | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 5 | 1 | 0 | 27 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 40 | 19 | 56 (highest) |
| 38% above value if growth stopped today | 56% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $7.6B | $1.6B | Not reported | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |