The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MKC · Consumer Staples · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
MOJO · Consumer Staples · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
STZ · Consumer Staples · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CELH | MKC | MOJO | STZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 43 | 46 (highest) | 44 | 43 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 61 | 75 | — |
| Pricing power | 67 | 66 | 68 | 85 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 6 | 20 | 4 | 22 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 35 (highest) | 22 | 29 | 23 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 59 (highest) | — | 42 |
| 481% above value if growth stopped today | 60% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $7.0B | $13.5B | $7.5M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |