The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KLC · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DUKR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CPS | KLC | DUKR | GM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 27 | 28 (highest) | 27 | 27 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 58 (highest) | 53 | 20 | 55 |
| Pricing power | 0 | — | 10 (highest) | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 17 | 33 (highest) | — | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 40 | 0 | 55 (highest) | 40 |
| Capital allocation | 21 | 24 | 24 | 40 (highest) |
| No price data | 981% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 38% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $501M | $583M | $11.8M | $74.7B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |