The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CRL · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

UA · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

WH · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BODI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureCRLUAWHBODI
Moat Score (0–100)35 (highest)35 (highest)35 (highest)35 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend461355 (highest)20
Pricing power100 (highest)7791
Returns on capital18847 (highest)10
Balance-sheet safety028255 (highest)
Capital allocation1250 (highest)370
188% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)1098% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$13.7B$2.0BNot reported$34.4M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2025