The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LGCY · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CTAS | SFM | ULTA | LGCY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 91 | 92 (highest) | 92 (highest) | 90 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 99 | 99 | 97 | 100 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 77 (highest) | 60 | 61 | — |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 91 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 90 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 60 |
| 378% above value if growth stopped today | 115% above value if growth stopped today | 102% above value if growth stopped today | 88% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $85.3B | $6.4B | $26.9B | $132M |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |