The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CTRN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CTRN | RRGB | AUC | DLTI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 36 | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 36 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 21 | 42 (highest) | 33 | 13 |
| Pricing power | — | 100 (highest) | 70 | 60 |
| Returns on capital | 34 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 51 | 17 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 24 | 24 | 53 (highest) |
| 808% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $525M | $130M | $93.6M | $22.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 |