The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CODQL · Materials · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | DLX | VRA | CODQL | ENTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 42 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 69 (highest) | 10 | 15 | 47 |
| Pricing power | 92 (highest) | 86 | 41 | 76 |
| Returns on capital | 16 | 0 | 91 (highest) | 41 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 3 | 55 (highest) | — | 1 |
| Capital allocation | 35 | 64 (highest) | 24 | 46 |
| 11% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 98% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 649% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.2B | $103M | $30.5M | $19.6B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |