The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RDCT · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SEG · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | ECHO | RDCT | SEG | GMBL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 10 | 70 (highest) | 50 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 0 | — | 93 |
| Returns on capital | 4 (highest) | — | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 756% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $25.3B | Not reported | $333M | $340575 |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2023 |