The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KITL · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | EVI | HOUR | RH | KITL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 | 48 (highest) | 47 | 47 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 (highest) | 78 | 26 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 36 | 86 (highest) | 63 | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 9 | 69 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 31 | 56 (highest) | 0 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 75 | 9 | 80 (highest) | 44 |
| No price data | 644% above value if growth stopped today | 57% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $61.2M | $2.2B | $336763 |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2023 |