The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ASO · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
KNIH · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | G | ASO | FND | KNIH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 75 | 76 (highest) | 76 (highest) | 75 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 87 (highest) | 29 | 56 | 85 |
| Pricing power | 60 | 54 | 72 | 96 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 73 | 100 (highest) | 72 | 18 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 64 | 97 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 88 | 100 (highest) | 78 | — |
| 3% above value if growth stopped today | 37% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 74% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $6.0B | $3.6B | $4.8B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |