The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DUKR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GM | DUKR | CPS | NXXT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 20 | 58 | 63 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 0 | 10 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | — | 17 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 40 | 55 (highest) | 40 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 40 | 24 | 21 | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 38% below high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $74.7B | $11.8M | $501M | $45.7M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |