The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ASTS · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | GSAT | ASTS | LTH | CXDO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 60 | 63 (highest) | 60 | 58 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 60 | 85 (highest) | 80 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 71 | 80 | 81 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | — | 0 | 7 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 95 | 78 | 77 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 44 | 60 (highest) | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | 961% above value if growth stopped today | 707% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $157.4B | $11.4B | $9.0B | $175M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |